> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • Philanthropy 50
  • Nonprofits and the Trump Agenda
  • Impact Stories Hub
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Better Ratings Help Small Charities but Not Big Ones

By  Alex Daniels
February 29, 2016
Research

Larger charities struggling to cut administrative costs to get a coveted third or fourth star from Charity Navigator may be wasting their time, a recent study suggests. Their fundraising didn’t get a boost when their ratings from the charity watchdog improved.

But for smaller charities, getting another star can be a bonanza: Those with less than $8.5 million in assets and relatively low fundraising expenses saw contributions soar by nearly 20 percent.

THE DATA

Bariş Yörük, an economist at the State University of New York at Albany, studied four years of Charity Navigator data, and his findings mirror research in the business world. Studies have shown, for instance, that a one-star increase in a rating on consumer-driven review site Yelp can help nonchain restaurants increase sales by up to 9 percent, but the site has a negligible effect on revenue at chain eateries.

We're sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network.

Please allow access to our site, and then refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, please contact us at 571-540-8070 or cophelp@philanthropy.com

Research

Larger charities struggling to cut administrative costs to get a coveted third or fourth star from Charity Navigator may be wasting their time, a recent study suggests. Their fundraising didn’t get a boost when their ratings from the charity watchdog improved.

But for smaller charities, getting another star can be a bonanza: Those with less than $8.5 million in assets and relatively low fundraising expenses saw contributions soar by nearly 20 percent.

THE DATA

Bariş Yörük, an economist at the State University of New York at Albany, studied four years of Charity Navigator data, and his findings mirror research in the business world. Studies have shown, for instance, that a one-star increase in a rating on consumer-driven review site Yelp can help nonchain restaurants increase sales by up to 9 percent, but the site has a negligible effect on revenue at chain eateries.

The reason, Mr. Yörük suggests, is that places like Olive Garden and Red Lobster are so well-known that customers don’t need an independent rating to check on quality. Similarly, donors don’t typically depend on Charity Navigator to determine the effectiveness of brand-name nonprofits like the Salvation Army or Catholic Charities. Instead, they rely on the ratings to suss out little-known charities that don’t have the reach, advertising budget, and history of a more established organization. In those cases, an improved rating can really catch a donor’s eye. On average, an additional star resulted in an additional $353,000 in gifts.

ADVERTISEMENT

DIGGING DEEPER

So should smaller nonprofits manipulate their budgets and cut spending to earn another star from Charity Navigator and attract more support? Bad idea, Mr. Yörük says. By slashing fundraising and administrative expenses, charities put their ability to function and attract donors in jeopardy; they risk a drop in fundraising more serious than the benefits an additional star can bring.

“There is always a trade-off,” the researcher writes.

FIND IT

The paper, “Charity Ratings,” was published in the Spring 2016 volume of the Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.

A version of this article appeared in the March 1, 2016, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Finance and RevenueMass FundraisingCommunications and Marketing
Alex Daniels
Before joining the Chronicle in 2013, Alex covered Congress and national politics for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. He covered the 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns and reported extensively about Walmart Stores for the Little Rock paper.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED, GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY
  • Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Podcasts
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    • Impact Stories
    Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Podcasts
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    • Impact Stories
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Gifts and Grants Received
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Chronicle Fellowships
    • Pressroom
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Gifts and Grants Received
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Chronicle Fellowships
    • Pressroom
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Site License Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Site License Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin