> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • An Update for Readers on Our New Nonprofit Status
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Flush With $51 Billion, Donor-Advised Funds Face Questions About Payouts

By  Alex Daniels and 
Drew Lindsay
October 27, 2016

Donor-advised funds are sitting on considerable cash, thanks to a flood of giving and the stock market’s post-recession rebound. Collectively, 85 of the largest donor-advised-fund sponsors managed $51 billion in assets in 2013 — up 159 percent since 2008, according to a Chronicle analysis.

As these accounts have swelled, the dollars spun off as grants have increased every year. Still, the rate of grant making has slowed. The large donor-advised funds in the Chronicle analysis paid out 14 percent of assets in 2013, down from 20 percent in 2008.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from v144.philanthropy.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Donor-advised funds are sitting on considerable cash, thanks to a flood of giving and the stock market’s post-recession rebound. Collectively, 85 of the largest donor-advised-fund sponsors managed $51 billion in assets in 2013 — up 159 percent since 2008, according to a Chronicle analysis.

As these accounts have swelled, the dollars spun off as grants have increased every year. Still, the rate of grant making has slowed. The large donor-advised funds in the Chronicle analysis paid out 14 percent of assets in 2013, down from 20 percent in 2008.

This decline worries critics of donor-advised funds, who contend the accounts are attracting contributions that would otherwise go to charities and be put to use immediately. Charitable giving is being warehoused, they argue, doing nothing but generating management and investment fees.

Donor-advised-fund sponsors, however, argue that a booming stock market has sent asset values skyrocketing. Grant making will catch up, they say, and payout rates will increase.

ADVERTISEMENT

To nudge donors to give, some sponsors are increasing penalties on dormant accounts. Instead of docking donors $500 when accounts are inactive for seven years, the Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program (No. 11) now places a 5 percent charge on accounts idle for five years. “We don’t want the money to get trapped; that’s very anti-mission,” Vanguard President Jane Greenfield says.

Regardless, sponsors argue, distributions from accounts are already quite robust, particularly when compared with many private foundations that stick closely to the 5 percent they are required by law to pay out annually. Eight organizations in the Chronicle analysis had payout rates of 25 percent or more.

Congressional Intervention

Congress could intervene and force funds to pay out at a higher rate. The last attempt to overhaul the tax code included a proposed tax on donor-advised-fund assets that aren’t given to charities within five years. The legislation, championed in 2014 by then-House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp, failed to reach the House floor for a vote.

To ward off similar provisions, lobbyists representing commercial funds and community foundations fanned out across Capitol Hill. Their message: Donor-advised funds support charities close to home. Often, fund lobbyists would show a legislator a map of his or her Congressional district filled with colored dots, each representing a charity that received contributions from account holders, says Jorge Castro, who has represented the National Philanthropic Trust (No. 17), a national donor-advised fund sponsor.

Philanthropy 400: a New No. 1, and a Record Year in Giving
Philanthropy 400: A New No. 1, and a Record Year in Giving
United Way is pushed from the top rung of The Chronicle’s annual ranking of U.S. charities as a young upstart surges into the lead — signaling big changes for philanthropy. Plus: What drove big gains at some of the year’s notable organizations.
  • Opinion: Critics of Donor-Advised Funds Miss What’s Great About These Tools
  • Fidelity Charitable Knocks United Way Out of Top Place in Charity Rankings
  • How the 2016 Philanthropy 400 Was Compiled

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s not peanuts,” he says of the cash flowing from accounts to nonprofits.

There hasn’t been another attempt to limit the funds since Mr. Camp left office at the beginning of 2015. In fact, the only legislative effort currently in play is designed to encourage the rush of assets into donor-advised funds. Bills pending in the Senate and the House would allow tax-free transfers from individual retirement accounts to donor-advised funds.

Still, controversies about the Trump and Clinton foundations could prompt Congress to reconsider the tax treatment of nonprofits. And lawmakers have signaled their interest in regulating large college and university endowments, which may lead to increased scrutiny of any accumulation of wealth earmarked for charity.

If Congress takes a deep dive into the tax code, nothing is sacrosanct, some lobbyists warn. “I don’t think the attention is 100 percent off of donor-advised funds,” says Sue Santa, senior vice president for public policy at the Council on Foundations. “We need to be very mindful.”

A version of this article appeared in the November 1, 2016, issue.
Read other items in this Philanthropy 400: A New No. 1, and a Record Year in Giving package.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Fundraising from Individuals
Alex Daniels
Before joining the Chronicle in 2013, Alex covered Congress and national politics for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. He covered the 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns and reported extensively about Walmart Stores for the Little Rock paper.
Drew Lindsay
Drew is a longtime magazine writer and editor who joined the Chronicle of Philanthropy in 2014.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

  • Donor-Advised Funds Reshape the Philanthropy Landscape
  • A New Way to Give: Inside the Donor-Advised-Fund Explosion
  • Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Organizational Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Organizational Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • pinterest
  • facebook
  • linkedin