> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • An Update for Readers on Our New Nonprofit Status
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Opinion
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

For Jeff Bezos’s Philanthropic Focus, Readers Favor Long-Term Change

By  Cody Switzer
June 27, 2017
For Jeff Bezos’s Philanthropic Focus, Readers Favor Long-Term Change
Brent Lewis/The Denver Post/Getty Images

Is it better for a major donor to focus his philanthropy more on short-term or long-term changes?

We asked you that question last week in light of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos’s tweet saying he wanted to give to solve immediate problems but also asking for guidance on his philanthropy. A slight majority of you, 55 percent, believe that long-term change is the better focus.

Of course, this binary choice oversimplifies the decision that Mr. Bezos faces, but you made several arguments in favor of one side or the other.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from v144.philanthropy.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Is it better for a major donor to focus his philanthropy more on short-term or long-term changes?

We asked you that question last week in light of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos’s tweet saying he wanted to give to solve immediate problems but also asking for guidance on his philanthropy. A slight majority of you, 55 percent, believe that long-term change is the better focus.

Of course, this binary choice oversimplifies the decision that Mr. Bezos faces, but you made several arguments in favor of one side or the other.

Below are some of your reasons for voting how you did, edited for brevity and clarity.

In Favor of Short-Term Wins

ADVERTISEMENT

Meg Carter, communications specialist at ChildFund International

The world is a complex, adaptive system, responding to many shifts — climate, conflict, demographic, epidemic, governance, to name a few. Any long-term plan will be derailed by factors that you, as a philanthropist, cannot control. Outcomes will never be clearly attributable to your interventions, so you will have difficulty evaluating your success, both in the interim & the long term.

Our experience with poverty indicates 3 key areas where you can make a substantial short-term difference: unconditional cash transfers (because most poor people need money to move out of poverty), health care (because disease keeps adults out of work & children out of school), and education (because educating girls is highly correlated with a country’s development).

David Broussard, vice president and grant-services team leader at Dickerson, Bakker & Associates

ADVERTISEMENT

Short-term philanthropy — especially for someone who is new to philanthropy — is always the way to go. It allows a short feedback loop to understand the impact and the shortcomings of financial support. It allows the donor to experience giving in a way that gives them the first-hand perspective of where and how the systems need to change.

Funding a homeless shelter and being actively a part of it is a great first step. I worry that Mr. Bezos will be sucked into the endless war of philanthropic ideology and waste his funds fighting a losing battle — at least at this stage of his philanthropic career. Start small, get your feet wet, and resist the pressure to make massive gifts right off the bat. The experience of giving first-hand is what’s needed in the near-term as an experiential lens through which larger gifts and his own passion for potential systemic change can be discovered personally.

Elijah Lutwama, head of finance at the Agency for Cooperation and Research in Development in Kenya

There are a number of short-term needs that take away people’s ability to be actors in their own destiny. The world today has many disasters both man-made and natural that strike individuals, families, and communities. It derails their ongoing livelihood mechanisms and, depending on the ferocity with which it strikes, even depletes their strength to carry on.

ADVERTISEMENT

There is a need to ensure that there are stable and sustained resources to provide help when it’s needed most, to rebuild communities and reignite their sources of resilience.

Interventions that allow people to rebuild and develop themselves have a long-term impact.

In Favor of a Long-Term Focus

Leslie Maloney, senior vice president and education-program manager at the Carol Ann and Ralph V. Haile, Jr./ U.S. Bank Foundation

ADVERTISEMENT

I have found that often short-term fixes only address the symptoms — Band-Aid fixes that do not alter the long-term root causes that create the symptoms. We heard it from one student at Berea College who grew up with his grandparents and was often homeless. When asked if his family availed themselves of social services, he said yes, but they were only Band-Aids — they did not change his family situation.

The societal problems we face today have occurred over the long term and require long-term solutions to have impact. It is hard to stay focused on issues when all you see is incremental change.

Michelle Goodwin, vice president of advancement at the College of Southern Maryland and executive director of the CSM Foundation

Impact is the answer, and the horizon is as different for the many different causes as there are opportunities for change. Focus more on the level of impact and the sustainability of that impact.

ADVERTISEMENT

For example: A partial scholarship of $2,000 can make a difference between attending college or not, especially for community-college students. One of those students may be the next Walt Disney or Tom Hanks, both community-college graduates.

Greta Rios, president of Ollin, Jóvenes en Movimiento, a Mexican charity

All efforts need to be focused on creating change at the system level. We need to invest in addressing those causes, not their effects.

A version of this article appeared in the July 5, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Major-Gift Fundraising

Op-Ed Submission Guidelines

The Chronicle’s Opinion section is designed to spark robust debate about all aspects of the nonprofit world. We welcome submissions that provide new insights and promote innovative thinking about leadership, fundraising, grant-making policy, and more.
See details about how to submit an opinion piece or letter to the editor.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

  • Jeff Bezos Says Helping the Neediest Now May Be Where His Philanthropy Goes
  • Nonprofit Leaders Respond to Jeff Bezos’s Request for Giving Advice
  • Opinion: Jeff Bezos, Here’s How to Focus on Both Today and Tomorrow
  • Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Organizational Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Organizational Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • pinterest
  • facebook
  • linkedin