> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • An Update for Readers on Our New Nonprofit Status
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Fundraising
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Fundraisers Who Use Academic Research Do Better, Study Finds

By  Michael Anft
December 23, 2014

About half the nation’s nonprofits consult scientific studies on how best to approach donors, and those groups that do so are more likely to raise more money, a new report says.

Nearly 1,200 groups from the United States and Canada responded to the survey, which was designed to learn how groups use scientific findings and whether those that do had better results this year than last.

Organizations that reported an uptick in donations—29 percent of the total—were more likely to regularly evaluate their fundraising methods than those who didn’t. Those that at least sometimes performed evaluations that incorporated scientific findings also were more likely to report an increase in donations.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from v144.philanthropy.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

About half the nation’s nonprofits consult scientific studies on how best to approach donors, and those groups that do so are more likely to raise more money, a new report says.

Nearly 1,200 groups from the United States and Canada responded to the survey, which was designed to learn how groups use scientific findings and whether those that do had better results this year than last.

Organizations that reported an uptick in donations—29 percent of the total—were more likely to regularly evaluate their fundraising methods than those who didn’t. Those that at least sometimes performed evaluations that incorporated scientific findings also were more likely to report an increase in donations.

But the report offers evidence that about half of groups are not availing themselves of a growing body of scientific literature on fundraising.

A Spurt in Research

During the past decade, more and more university researchers have begun to study how the brain works when people donate, or how the behavior of others affects one’s decision about where and when to give, and how much.

ADVERTISEMENT

The study, conducted by the Science of Philanthropy Institute, a research center that operates out of the University of Chicago with the help of grant money from the Templeton Foundation, and the Nonprofit Research Collaborative at the School of Philanthropy at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, found that one of every two organizations reported it lacked staff members who have studied research methods. (The Chronicle aided in the study by inviting groups on its mailing list to participate.)

Nonprofits with annual budgets of less than $250,000 were less likely than large ones to have someone on hand with some knowledge of the scientific method. Over all, only 7 percent of groups surveyed said they always consult research before making fundraising decisions, while 45 percent reported they sometimes do.

“While larger organizations are starting to look at science when they make their fundraising decisions, smaller ones have a long way to go,” says Edith Dobrez, executive director of the Science of Philanthropy Institute.

Why Experiments Matter

She encourages groups of all sizes to not only use studies conducted by academic researchers, but to design their own experiments as well, perhaps by offering several types of fundraising approaches at the same time and then measuring the results of each.

“Our findings show the value of using the scientific method and of using randomized studies and control groups,” Ms. Dobrez says.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nearly half of the groups surveyed said they would consider using research methods to test new fundraising approaches.

“The encouraging thing is that more than 70 percent of all groups at least occasionally evaluate their fundraising methods,” Ms. Dobrez adds. “Our hope is that they tap the available research more often as they move forward.”

A version of this article appeared in the January 22, 2015, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Fundraising from Individuals
Michael Anft
Michael Anft is a journalist, author, teacher, and regular contributor to the Chronicle of Philanthropy.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Organizational Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Organizational Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • pinterest
  • facebook
  • linkedin