> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • Philanthropy 50
  • Nonprofits and the Trump Agenda
  • Impact Stories Hub
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Guilt Spurs Giving

By  Alex Daniels
May 4, 2015
Guilt Spurs Giving 1

A group of Yale University researchers has found that a fundraising pitch mentioning an indulgence, like Ben & Jerry’s ice cream, tends to result in more charitable donations than other kinds of appeals. The reason? It induces feelings of shame.

The Theory

Lots of studies have shown that people often make gifts to impress their peers or to feel joy and satisfaction. But the Yale researchers posited that the choice to make a gift isn’t always tied to feel-good motivations. The researchers thought that if during a pitch they showed a hedonistic product — one likely to be regarded as fun or indulgent — potential donors would likely have negative feelings about themselves if they didn’t make a gift. By showing donors a treat, like a scrumptious pint of ice cream, the researchers expected people to give more freely than if they were shown something mundane.

We're sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network.

Please allow access to our site, and then refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, please contact us at 571-540-8070 or cophelp@philanthropy.com

Guilt Spurs Giving 1

A group of Yale University researchers has found that a fundraising pitch mentioning an indulgence, like Ben & Jerry’s ice cream, tends to result in more charitable donations than other kinds of appeals. The reason? It induces feelings of shame.

The Theory

Lots of studies have shown that people often make gifts to impress their peers or to feel joy and satisfaction. But the Yale researchers posited that the choice to make a gift isn’t always tied to feel-good motivations. The researchers thought that if during a pitch they showed a hedonistic product — one likely to be regarded as fun or indulgent — potential donors would likely have negative feelings about themselves if they didn’t make a gift. By showing donors a treat, like a scrumptious pint of ice cream, the researchers expected people to give more freely than if they were shown something mundane.

The Test

In a series of five experiments, the researchers made reference to both splashy products and more utilitarian items, like a tube of toothpaste, to solicit donations. The researchers also tested how a product was described. For instance, they offered two test pitches for a $10 donation to Unicef using a hand blender. One pitch showcased the blender as snazzy (“Remember, $10 is about the cost of a hand blender, which is great for making exotic cocktail drinks and is a good tool for a luxurious lifestyle”). Another said the blender was “a useful tool for a healthy lifestyle.”

Results

Donors who were asked whether they were likely to give after an “indulgent” pitch reported greater feelings of selfishness about potentially declining to give than when exposed to a pitch involving a utilitarian item. And when they were actually asked to donate, those shown a hedonistic product were more generous. Jennifer Savary, co-author of the study, says that when people are presented with a pleasurable product, they contrast the suffering a donation is intended to heal with the sense of satisfaction they’d feel enjoying the item.

“People are interested in doing good,” she says. “But people are even more interested in not seeing themselves as jerks. It’s a real strong motivation we can tap into.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Digging Deeper

The test subjects were mostly students with limited budgets, so researchers used relatively cheap items like ice cream or cookies from a popular campus shop. Ms. Savary believes pricier items, like a cruise, could be used to attract bigger gifts. “This could have potential even at the high dollar amount,” she says.

Find It

“Giving Against the Odds: When Tempting Alternatives Increase the Willingness to Donate,” in the February 2015 issue of the Journal of Marketing Research.

A version of this article appeared in the May 4, 2015, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Digital FundraisingFundraising from IndividualsMass Fundraising
Alex Daniels
Before joining the Chronicle in 2013, Alex covered Congress and national politics for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. He covered the 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns and reported extensively about Walmart Stores for the Little Rock paper.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED, GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY
  • Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Podcasts
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    • Impact Stories
    Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Podcasts
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    • Impact Stories
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Gifts and Grants Received
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Chronicle Fellowships
    • Pressroom
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Gifts and Grants Received
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Chronicle Fellowships
    • Pressroom
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Site License Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Site License Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin