> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • Our Transition to a Nonprofit
Sign In
  • Latest Articles
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data & Research
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • Latest Articles
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data & Research
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • Latest Articles
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data & Research
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Advice
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Honey, I Shrunk the Donor Pool

By  Debra E. Blum
February 29, 2016
Shrinking the Donor Pool

The National Wildlife Federation used to boast that it had a million supporters. Now it’s intentionally letting that number slide, a bet that fewer donors will translate into more revenue.

Counterintuitive? Perhaps, but the organization says the new strategy, which it has been phasing in since 2013, is working. Though membership last year was down about 15 percent from 2013, the average gift size from members has increased more than 13 percent. Net membership revenue, which dipped at first, has already started to recover.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from v144.philanthropy.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Shrinking the Donor Pool

The National Wildlife Federation used to boast that it had a million supporters. Now it’s intentionally letting that number slide, a bet that fewer donors will translate into more revenue.

Counterintuitive? Perhaps, but the organization says the new strategy, which it has been phasing in since 2013, is working. Though membership last year was down about 15 percent from 2013, the average gift size from members has increased more than 13 percent. Net membership revenue, which dipped at first, has already started to recover.

This is good news for an organization that once viewed the membership total as sacred. “For years it was, ‘Acquire members and focus on getting the highest membership count, no matter how little they gave,’ " says Karen Wagner, the group’s vice president for finance. “Volume was the priority.”

That changed in 2013: Scuttling the typical more-is-better approach, the National Wildlife Federation began to slash the number of direct-mail solicitations it sent out and alter operations to identify and attract donors more connected to the charity and its mission — and thus more likely to both give more and to stick around.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We went value over volume,” says Sandra Miao, director of membership. “The idea is that everyone who comes in will be a higher-value acquisition and come back year after year.”

Ready for a Change

Revenue projections under the new plan that Ms. Miao and her colleagues presented to the nonprofit’s leaders in 2012 were hardly optimistic. But, she says, the group was ready for change, especially after rocky years around the recession and estimates that its membership would drop over the next 10 years anyway. What’s more, the organization was watching very small donors (often called “tippers,” because they might make one $5 or $10 “tip”) churn expensively on and off membership rolls.

Though the new strategy promised a short-term revenue hit, officials believed the organization could absorb it. Dollars from members (donors who give from $1 to $10,000 a year) usually make up only around 25 percent of its private support each year, with additional income from such sources as publications and licensing.

Best of all, Ms. Miao says, the plan predicted cost savings. While the organization is paying more in some areas — most notably, purchasing lists of potential donors — it is spending less elsewhere. For instance, it is acquiring many more donors who elect not to receive premium gifts or who make automatic monthly contributions. Also, the group is sending fewer direct-mail solicitations: 17.8 million last year, 1.2 million fewer than in 2012.

“Mailing less also helps reduce our carbon footprint,” Ms. Wagner says, “which helps advance our mission.”

ADVERTISEMENT

To keep its newest donors tied to its mission, the National Wildlife Federation is changing follow-up appeals, too. Instead of sending solicitations with broad messages, fundraisers are segmenting donors by their interests. If a donor has responded to a mailing with information about the group’s conservation work with bison, for example, future appeals to that individual will include updates on that work.

“We are paying attention to the long-term value of these donors, who come in at a higher level and then stay with us because we are connecting with them,” Ms. Miao says. “These are not tippers.”

A version of this article appeared in the March 1, 2016, issue.
Read other items in this Killing Sacred Cows package.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Executive LeadershipFundraising from Individuals
Debra E. Blum
Debra E. Blum is a freelance writer and has been a contributor to The Chronicle of Philanthropy since 2002.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

  • Killing Sacred Cows: Charities Ditch Longtime Fundraising Strategies and Come Out Ahead
  • Turning Down That Big Grant
  • Charity Questions the Value of Its Galas
  • A Bike-athon Looks at the ‘True Cost’ of Raising Money
  • A Tool to Measure the Real Success of a Fundraising Event
  • Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Organizational Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Organizational Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • pinterest
  • facebook
  • linkedin