> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • Philanthropy 50
  • Nonprofits and the Trump Agenda
  • Impact Stories Hub
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

How Big Foundations Stay Big: An Interactive Guide to Giving Rates

By  Alex Daniels
March 7, 2017

By law, private foundations must distribute at least 5 percent of their assets each year. Grants, tax payments, and certain administrative expenses all count as qualifying distributions.

Using Internal Revenue Service figures compiled by the Foundation Center, The Chronicle found that most big foundations stick pretty close to that 5 percent minimum. The Chronicle used a formula to determine foundation distributions that approximates grant makers’ own figures, though because of flexibility in IRS rules, it doesn’t necessarily account for how each foundation meets the agency’s mandate.

We're sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network.

Please allow access to our site, and then refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, please contact us at 571-540-8070 or cophelp@philanthropy.com

By law, private foundations must distribute at least 5 percent of their assets each year. Grants, tax payments, and certain administrative expenses all count as qualifying distributions.

Using Internal Revenue Service figures compiled by the Foundation Center, The Chronicle found that most big foundations stick pretty close to that 5 percent minimum. The Chronicle used a formula to determine foundation distributions that approximates grant makers’ own figures, though because of flexibility in IRS rules, it doesn’t necessarily account for how each foundation meets the agency’s mandate.

1. Toeing the 5% Line

Dividing foundation distributions, including taxes and certain administrative expenses, by the assets available for charitable use reveals the foundation’s distribution rate. The diagonal line indicates the 5 percent threshold, which most foundations stay close to, though some, like the Walton Family Foundation, are regularly much higher. Select foundations from the list below to show or hide them in the chart, which adjusts according to the asset size of the foundations being displayed.

Distributions compared to assets

KEY
Distribution rate
5% threshold
Gates Foundation not included

These 17 foundations consistently distribute about 5 percent of their available assets.

Hover over the dots to see details.

Click the names on the right to see other foundation data.

Click the foundation name to hide or show it in the chart

Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Annie E. Casey Foundation Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Bloomberg Philanthropies Carnegie Corporation of New York Charles Stewart Mott Foundation David and Lucile Packard Foundation Duke Endowment Eli & Edythe Broad Foundation Ford Foundation Foundation to Promote Open Society Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation John S. and James L. Knight Foundation John Templeton Foundation JPB Foundation Kresge Foundation Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust Lilly Endowment Margaret A. Cargill Foundation Robert W. Woodruff Foundation Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Rockefeller Foundation Simons Foundation Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation William and Flora Hewlett Foundation W. K. Kellogg Foundation Walton Family Foundation
ADVERTISEMENT

2. Grants vs. administrative expenses

Foundations are allowed to use a portion of their administrative expenses when they calculate their distribution rate. Below, see each foundation’s expenses and grants as percentages of their overall distributions. Other components, such as grants carried over from previous years and tax payments, make up the remainder of distributions. Some foundations have higher expense rates based on the way they operate. For instance, the Annie E. Casey Foundation, which had a median expense rate of 27 percent from 2010 to 2014, considers itself a hybrid: It is a private foundation that must file a 990-PF form with the IRS, but it works much like an operating foundation that uses staff to directly manage grantees, driving up its staff head count and administrative costs.

Proportions of qualified distributions

2014
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
KEY
Grants
Administrative expenses

3. Asset growth

One argument for keeping distribution rates at 5% is so foundations can maintain their assets and keep pursuing their charitable goals far into the future. Charting the foundations’ assets here shows that despite dips in 2011, every organization ended 2014 with more in assets than it had in 2010, no matter their distribution rates.

ADVERTISEMENT

In most cases foundations, especially those that received their original donations generations ago, benefited from a strong market. But some grant makers also scored additional gifts from living donors, which helped increase their endowments. For instance the JPB Foundation received two gifts, one in 2011 and one in 2014 totaling more than $1 billion, which sharply increased its assets.

Assets, 2010-2014

4. Consistency in distribution rates

Not only do most foundations stick close to the 5 percent IRS requirement, but few vary much from year to year, though there are exceptions. The Foundation to Promote an Open Society distributed up to 18.2 percent, and the Walton Family Foundation’s rate ranged from 20.2 percent to 40.6 percent. Both of those grant makers received gifts from their donors that allowed them to grow their corpus while distributing money at a higher rate. The JPB Foundation, which also received large gifts, had one year with an extraordinarily high distribution rate.

Distribution rates, 2010-2014

KEY
Highest rateMedian rateLowest rate
ADVERTISEMENT

5. Searchable data on distributions

Browse all of the data for the organizations analyzed or sort by their qualifying distributions, assets, distribution rates, and more.

All years
  • All years
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
Clear Search
xYour search did not return any results. Check for mis-spellings or try shortening your search term.
Show all

A version of this article appeared in the March 1, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Foundation GivingFinance and RevenueGrant SeekingData & Research
Alex Daniels
Before joining the Chronicle in 2013, Alex covered Congress and national politics for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. He covered the 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns and reported extensively about Walmart Stores for the Little Rock paper.
  • Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Podcasts
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    • Impact Stories
    Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Podcasts
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    • Impact Stories
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Gifts and Grants Received
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Chronicle Fellowships
    • Pressroom
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Gifts and Grants Received
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Chronicle Fellowships
    • Pressroom
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Site License Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Site License Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin