> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • An Update for Readers on Our New Nonprofit Status
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
How America Gives
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

How Much People Give in the Largest Cities

October 5, 2014

This article was updated on January 13, 2015. See our editor’s note.

Only two of the 50 biggest metropolitan areas—Salt Lake City and Memphis—gave more than 5 percent of income to charity. The two least-generous were Hartford, Conn., and Providence, R.I., which each gave less than 2 percent of income.

Rank Metro area Giving rate, 2012 Change in giving since 2006
1 Salt Lake City 5.4% +2.7%
2 Memphis 5.1% +6.7%
3 Birmingham, Ala. 4.8% +1.7%
4 Atlanta 4.0% +6.5%
5 Nashville
3.9% +4.8%
6 Jacksonville, Fla. 3.8% +8.7%
7 Oklahoma City 3.7% -1.6%
8 Dallas-Fort Worth
3.6% +4.6%
9 Charlotte, N.C. 3.4% -5.5%
10 Virginia Beach 3.3% -6.1%
11 Houston 3.2% +1.6%
12 Indianapolis 3.2% +5.2%
13 Louisville, Ky. 3.2% -3.3%
14 San Antonio 3.1% -2.8%
15 Orlando, Fla. 3.1% +4.0%
16 Kansas City, Mo.-Ks. 3.1% -1.6%
17 Richmond, Va. 3.0% -6.7%
18 Raleigh-Cary, NC 3.0% -7.4%
19 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, Fla. 3.0% +3.1%
20 Riverside, Calif. 3.0% -0.7%
21 Phoenix 2.9% +0.3%
22 Baltimore 2.9% -8.8%
23 St. Louis 2.9% -4.0%
24 Tampa-St. Petersburg, Fla. 2.9% 0.0%
25 New Orleans 2.8% -3.1%
26 Las Vegas 2.8% +14.9%
27 Washington 2.8% -9.5%
28 Los Angeles 2.8% -9.5%
29 Detroit 2.7% -4.9%
30 Cleveland 2.7% -3.6%
31 Milwaukee 2.7% -0.7%
32 Cincinnati 2.7% -6.4%
33 Portland, Ore. 2.6% -6.7%
34 Chicago 2.6% -5.1%
35 Denver 2.6% -0.8%
36 Austin, Tex. 2.6% -3.3%
37 Minneapolis-St. Paul 2.6% -9.4%
38 New York 2.6% -8.8%
39 Columbus, Ohio 2.6% -6.5%
40 Seattle 2.5% -6.7%
41 Philadelphia 2.5% -10.3%
42 San Diego 2.4% -8.0%
43 Sacramento 2.4% -4.4%
44 Pittsburgh 2.4% -5.9%
45 San Francisco 2.4% -5.2%
46 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, N.Y. 2.3% -10.6%
47 Boston 2.3% -3.8%
48 San Jose, Calif. 2.2% -7.8%
49 Providence, R.I. 1.9% -8.3%
50 Hartford, Conn. 1.9% -8.9%

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from v144.philanthropy.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

This article was updated on January 13, 2015. See our editor’s note.

Only two of the 50 biggest metropolitan areas—Salt Lake City and Memphis—gave more than 5 percent of income to charity. The two least-generous were Hartford, Conn., and Providence, R.I., which each gave less than 2 percent of income.

Rank Metro area Giving rate, 2012 Change in giving since 2006
1 Salt Lake City 5.4% +2.7%
2 Memphis 5.1% +6.7%
3 Birmingham, Ala. 4.8% +1.7%
4 Atlanta 4.0% +6.5%
5 Nashville
3.9% +4.8%
6 Jacksonville, Fla. 3.8% +8.7%
7 Oklahoma City 3.7% -1.6%
8 Dallas-Fort Worth
3.6% +4.6%
9 Charlotte, N.C. 3.4% -5.5%
10 Virginia Beach 3.3% -6.1%
11 Houston 3.2% +1.6%
12 Indianapolis 3.2% +5.2%
13 Louisville, Ky. 3.2% -3.3%
14 San Antonio 3.1% -2.8%
15 Orlando, Fla. 3.1% +4.0%
16 Kansas City, Mo.-Ks. 3.1% -1.6%
17 Richmond, Va. 3.0% -6.7%
18 Raleigh-Cary, NC 3.0% -7.4%
19 Miami-Fort Lauderdale, Fla. 3.0% +3.1%
20 Riverside, Calif. 3.0% -0.7%
21 Phoenix 2.9% +0.3%
22 Baltimore 2.9% -8.8%
23 St. Louis 2.9% -4.0%
24 Tampa-St. Petersburg, Fla. 2.9% 0.0%
25 New Orleans 2.8% -3.1%
26 Las Vegas 2.8% +14.9%
27 Washington 2.8% -9.5%
28 Los Angeles 2.8% -9.5%
29 Detroit 2.7% -4.9%
30 Cleveland 2.7% -3.6%
31 Milwaukee 2.7% -0.7%
32 Cincinnati 2.7% -6.4%
33 Portland, Ore. 2.6% -6.7%
34 Chicago 2.6% -5.1%
35 Denver 2.6% -0.8%
36 Austin, Tex. 2.6% -3.3%
37 Minneapolis-St. Paul 2.6% -9.4%
38 New York 2.6% -8.8%
39 Columbus, Ohio 2.6% -6.5%
40 Seattle 2.5% -6.7%
41 Philadelphia 2.5% -10.3%
42 San Diego 2.4% -8.0%
43 Sacramento 2.4% -4.4%
44 Pittsburgh 2.4% -5.9%
45 San Francisco 2.4% -5.2%
46 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, N.Y. 2.3% -10.6%
47 Boston 2.3% -3.8%
48 San Jose, Calif. 2.2% -7.8%
49 Providence, R.I. 1.9% -8.3%
50 Hartford, Conn. 1.9% -8.9%

Source: Chronicle analysis of Internal Revenue Service data

Editor’s Note: In this and other stories on How America Gives, we used ZIP-code data from the IRS to make comparisons between 2006 and 2012, the only years for which income and charitable donation data were available broken out by income and geography. However, to protect privacy, the IRS suppresses some ZIP-code data when there are fewer than 20 filers in a given income group. As a result, some figures are lower than what they’d otherwise be.

ADVERTISEMENT

Since our original report, we’ve updated our interactive with county-level data for 2012, which do not have any data suppressed. Unfortunately, such data are not available for 2006.

Many of the figures used in this and other How America Gives stories are based on the original 2006 and 2012 ZIP-code data to make those year-over-year comparisons.

For the latest and most accurate 2012 data, see our interactive.

Read other items in this How America Gives 2014 package.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Fundraising from Individuals
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Organizational Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Organizational Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • pinterest
  • facebook
  • linkedin