> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • Our Transition to a Nonprofit
Sign In
  • Latest Articles
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data & Research
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • Latest Articles
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data & Research
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • Latest Articles
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data & Research
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Opinion
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Impact Investing Might Help Nonprofits Overseas Asphyxiated by Their Governments

By  Edwin Rekosh
February 22, 2016
As governments like Russia and China cut off charitable support from the United States and elsewhere, nonprofits might benefit from donors’ growing interest in blending investments and social-good work.
Yuri Kadobnov, AFP, Getty Images
As governments like Russia and China cut off charitable support from the United States and elsewhere, nonprofits might benefit from donors’ growing interest in blending investments and social-good work.

When Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg announced they would devote 99 percent of their Facebook wealth to charity, they became the public embodiment of two important trends transforming the world of philanthropy.

Not only did they demonstrate why philanthropic giving worldwide is at an all-time high, according to Charity Aid Foundation’s World Giving Index, they also made clear that we’re going to see an increasing focus by the wealthy on blending charitable giving with investment and policy work.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from v144.philanthropy.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

When Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg announced they would devote 99 percent of their Facebook wealth to charity, they became the public embodiment of two important trends transforming the world of philanthropy.

Not only did they demonstrate why philanthropic giving worldwide is at an all-time high, according to Charity Aid Foundation’s World Giving Index, they also made clear that we’re going to see an increasing focus by the wealthy on blending charitable giving with investment and policy work.

But what got lost in the excitement about the new philanthropy is a countervailing and deeply disturbing trend that limits the possibilities for people around the globe to improve their societies.

The story begins with the geopolitical shifts of the 1990s that enabled active citizens the world over to help remake their societies by forming nonprofits, many of which secured funding from large private foundations and governmental aid organizations in America and elsewhere.

Those nonprofit organizations grew like wildfire during the past quarter century, with many of them focusing on thorny problems their governments lack the resources, expertise, or political will to tackle. They help the public understand and express outrage about injustices suffered by minorities in their midst; they create opportunities for individuals to help others in their own communities; and they make legal systems work to protect the rights of the disadvantaged.

ADVERTISEMENT

So what’s the problem?

In the past several years — with Russia and China in the lead — country after country has enacted new laws and policies designed to asphyxiate nonprofits by focusing especially on the cross-border oxygen supply of charitable capital that has fueled their growth.

Indeed, governments of all political stripes, including those in long-standing democracies like India and newer ones like Hungary, have discovered an easy way to eliminate the complications presented by nonprofits they perceive to threaten their unitary control: vilify them as agents of foreign interests and adopt legal measures to cut off the cross-border flow of funding.

Nonprofits have suffered attacks from unfriendly governments before, but this fast-growing phenomenon, exploiting a vulnerable dependence on foreign financial support that has always been there, could pose an existential threat to civil society as we know it in many countries. And traditional modes of resistance might not work because it’s difficult to generate a sense of outrage about enforcement of seemingly technocratic legal requirements that have strong popular support.

Dr. Chan and Mr. Zuckerberg do not appear to be contemplating that particular problem, but they and all of the other new philanthropists popping up around the world — particularly in emerging markets like India, China, and Brazil — represent an important opportunity for increasingly beleaguered nonprofits.

ADVERTISEMENT

The pragmatic thinking of new philanthropists may lend itself well to the challenges of building civil society in places where governments are cutting off essential sources of support. Regulatory barriers restricting foreign charitable transfers do not apply to business investment, and new philanthropists are often agnostic as to whether their funding is characterized legally as a charitable donation or an investment. Further, the rise of new philanthropists in emerging markets throughout the world means there may be untapped local sources of support, though of course these donors’ expectations will be different from those of the large international ones.

It may be outside their comfort zone, but nonprofits that have grown strong on foreign grants would do well to re-examine their approaches to see if they might accomplish similar aims in ways that exploit this opportunity. Even human-rights organizations may be able to achieve some of their goals using approaches to support the work that is more familiar in fields like public health or delivery of basic services to the poor.

Some are already leading the way, particularly in showing how they can earn money by charging fees for their services, taking a page from social enterprise.

In India, for example, Schools of Equality develops and distributes curricula addressing inequality and human rights in Indian public and private schools to tackle attitudes that sustain phenomena such as infanticide of the girl child. Launched in 2014, the organization has already reached 10 schools in two provinces, with fees earned from private schools partially subsidizing the public ones. Their efforts to reshape the future generation’s attitude about gender equality might be exactly what is required to end this persistent human-rights problem.

Schools of Equality uses a strategy to fight gender violence very similar to that of other nonprofits. But it has developed a more resilient financial model of organization than most, one that could prove attractive to new philanthropists, whether from abroad or homegrown.

ADVERTISEMENT

That approach won’t work for all human-rights goals, but it’s an example worthy of consideration by nonprofits under attack everywhere.

Edwin Rekosh is founder and former president of PILnet: the Global Network for Public Interest Law.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Government and RegulationGrant SeekingFundraising from Individuals

Op-Ed Submission Guidelines

The Chronicle’s Opinion section is designed to spark robust debate about all aspects of the nonprofit world. We welcome submissions that provide new insights and promote innovative thinking about leadership, fundraising, grant-making policy, and more.
See details about how to submit an opinion piece or letter to the editor.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Organizational Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Organizational Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • pinterest
  • facebook
  • linkedin