> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • An Update for Readers on Our New Nonprofit Status
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

‘It Just Felt Like a Miracle’: Small Groups Win Big in Bitcoin Donor’s $56 Million Giving Spree

By  Drew Lindsay
February 22, 2018
Anonymous Bitcoin Donor Rains $56 Million on Stunned Nonprofits 1
iStock

One day in January, Linda Tannenbaum opened an email that would radically change her small, medical-research charity almost overnight. The note said that her organization would soon receive a gift of $1 million, to use as it saw fit.

Over the next couple of weeks, she swapped emails with the donor, whom she knew only by the alias “Pine” and with whom she never spoke. It was an informal exchange, with Pine occasionally adding a smiley face or an exclamation mark.

Then Pine sent Tannenbaum another second surprise email: “I’d be happy to discuss making a larger contribution,” it read. Soon after, Pine promised an additional $4 million.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from v144.philanthropy.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

One day in January, Linda Tannenbaum opened an email that would radically change her small, medical-research charity almost overnight. The note said that her organization would soon receive a gift of $1 million, to use as it saw fit.

Over the next couple of weeks, she swapped emails with the donor, whom she knew only by the alias “Pine” and with whom she never spoke. It was an informal exchange, with Pine occasionally adding a smiley face or an exclamation mark.

Then Pine sent Tannenbaum another second surprise email: “I’d be happy to discuss making a larger contribution,” it read. Soon after, Pine promised an additional $4 million.

Today, the Open Medicine Foundation is working with scientists on a host of studies to be funded with this $5 million — $2 million more than what it raised in 2017. It is just one of nearly 60 organizations, mostly charities, to receive windfall gifts from Pine ranging from $50,000 to $5 million.

Pine began this most unusual giving spree in December, aiming to give away the majority of a newly earned fortune in bitcoin. “I have far more money than I can ever spend,” Pine said on the social-media platform Reddit and invited groups to apply for money.

ADVERTISEMENT

Stunned and Delighted

Pine agreed to a phone interview with the Chronicle on the condition that the article include no identifying information. In the interview, the donor said the run of giving was over. After combing through more than 10,000 applications for funding with the help of friends, Pine made nearly $56 million in contributions, leaving a trail of delighted, often stunned nonprofit leaders.

Giving Strategies of ‘Pine’

  • Unlike many big philanthropists, who often reserve their big dollars for long-established organizations, Pine backed at least 28 organizations created in the past decade. Many have relatively young leaders; Sustainable Ocean Alliance, which received $1 million, was started in 2014 by Daniela Fernandez when she was a college student at Georgetown.
  • At least 18 of the gifts went to groups working on digital privacy issues or promoting open-source technology efforts. Among these are a number of groups that are rooted in Silicon Valley’s ethos and seek technological solutions to global poverty.
  • At least two provide cash transfers to improve the lives of the poor. GiveDirectly, which is running in Kenya the largest-ever trial of the idea of a universal basic income, received $5 million. New Incentives, which makes cash transfers to women in rural West Africa who vaccinate their children, received $250,000.
  • At least 15 organizations that received Pine’s gifts are focused on health care or advancing medical research. Among them: the Organ Preservation Alliance, a relatively new group of scientists studying how to make organs and tissues more widely available for transplants, research, and regenerative medicine. It received $2 million.
  • At least seven gifts went to conservation groups, including $250,000 to the two-year-old Wings for Conservation, a project of a Dutch charity that flies airplane surveillance missions to help government officials monitoring elephant poaching in Chad.

Chase Adam, a co-founder of Watsi, an international health group, was on a plane when his team got word to him that Pine had made a $1 million gift. He was so moved that he cried. “It just felt like a miracle,” he says.

Pine later upped it to $2 million, a total that covers nearly a year of Watsi’s operations at a critical time. The San Francisco organization — which launched just seven years ago and was the first nonprofit to get backing from Silicon Valley’s famous Y Combinator accelerator — is building technology to help developing countries provide universal health care.

Adam says Watsi since has received another $500,000 in anonymous cryptocurrency gifts, presumably from donors inspired by Pine.

Tannenbaum, meanwhile, says Pine’s gift has stirred an outpouring of gratitude from the patients who follow her group’s work. She started Open Medicine Foundation in 2012. She and Ron Davis, a scientist who leads a Stanford research center funded by the foundation, both have children who suffer from Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. They aim to spur research into chronic diseases that afflict millions and leave many bedridden.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hundreds of people thanked Pine on Reddit and on an Open Medicine webpage. “They believe Pine is one of us,” Tannenbaum says. “They believe someone really cares about us and really, truly believes in us.”

Bitcoin for Good

Pine is new to philanthropy, according to the donor, and did not set out to support any particular causes. “I was just thinking that I wanted to use my bitcoin for good in this world.”

But several themes emerged. Pine made a point of showering largess on relatively obscure organizations, bestowing cash on a few high-profile groups — the American Civil Liberties Union’s political arm and Charity: Water each received $2 million — but mostly on small organizations and those working on complicated issues that might not attract average donors.

Those included the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies ($5 million), a research group studying the use of marijuana and psychedelic drugs in medical treatments; Nuzzles & Co. ($1 million), a Utah pet-rescue and adoption organization; and the Water Project ($1 million), which is working to provide clean water to sub-Saharan Africa.

Pine also looked for groups that promised a “multiplier effect” — in other words, organizations parlaying donations into partnerships or rapid, technology-fueled expansion. A gift of $1 million, for instance, went to OpenMRS, a network of volunteers aiming to build open-source medical-records systems in developing countries. OpenMRS said Pine had contributed software patches to the effort previously.

ADVERTISEMENT

Surprise Gifts

Pine made the contributions in simple fashion, doling out bitcoin from something called the Pineapple Fund.

As a test before the Reddit invitation for funding requests, Pine donated bitcoin to four organizations. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which protects digital privacy and free expression, received a note in its general email inbox. “The subject line read, ‘The Pineapple Fund wants to give you $1 million,’ " says Aaron Jue, the organization’s development director. Thinking the note was a scam — like “those emails from a Nigerian prince,” Jue says — the organization didn’t respond until a second email arrived.

As Jue talked with Pine about the gift by email, his fears of a scam eased. “I could tell they were sincere,” he says. (Like others, Jue referred to Pine in the plural, partly because of Pine’s unknown gender and partly because it wasn’t clear how many people were involved.) “They knew the kind of work EFF did, and they sincerely wanted to support it.”

Later, when Pine began accepting funding requests, groups applied through an online form that took only a few minutes to complete. “I wanted them to spend less time on administrative work and more time on programs,” Pine explained.

Those who received gifts say Pine communicated only through brief emails; bitcoin deposits were usually handled by outside agencies, such as BitPay, which then transferred cash to the charity’s bank account. Gifts had few, if any, restrictions; Pine asked only that organizations provide occasional updates.

ADVERTISEMENT

Adam of Watsi said such simplicity belied a thoughtful giving process.

“Some people can see it as too simple, but in reality I think it’s actually the most sophisticated way to give — picking organizations they believe in, giving money with few strings attached, and letting organizations focus on their mission,” he says.

In discussions with organizations, Pine sought assurances that a big gift would not swamp the group. Writing to Tannenbaum after the first gift, Pine wanted to make sure any additional donation “is sustainable and does not harm [the group] once the funding runs out.”

Pine also opted for a transparency that big philanthropists don’t always embrace. Pine listed gifts on the Pineapple Fund website and included links to a blockchain ledger confirming the bitcoin deposits. Pine also posted gift announcements on Reddit and discussed the giving choices with commenters.

Pine said the closely guarded anonymity was partly for the sake of personal safety but also to focus attention on the cryptocurrency community broadly, which Pine said is often seen as filled with greedy speculators.

ADVERTISEMENT

When Pine announced the commitment to give, the value of the bitcoin set aside for philanthropy was about $86 million. But bitcoin’s value crashed in mid-January.

Nevertheless, Pine planned to start giving again if the value grew, saying, “This is not a one-time thing.” Next time, Pine plans to give money away more gradually and to assess the outcomes of gifts.

Groups that received the money, meanwhile, say the experience has taught them a few things. The Tennessee River Gorge Trust, a conservation group that received $250,000 from the Pineapple Fund, says it applied for funding even though it had never before accepted bitcoin donations. After Pine agreed to make a gift, the organization spent about a week setting up the mechanism to accept the donation and convert it to cash, says executive director Rick Huffines.

Huffines told his board he will keep that account open. “I told them that this could be a new face of philanthropy.”

Correction: A previous version of this article said the donor had given more than $53 million instead of nearly $56 million.

ADVERTISEMENT

A version of this article appeared in the April 5, 2018, issue.
Read other items in this Cryptocurrency and Nonprofits package.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Fundraising from IndividualsInnovationMajor-Gift Fundraising
Drew Lindsay
Drew is a longtime magazine writer and editor who joined the Chronicle of Philanthropy in 2014.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

  • Does Bitcoin Make Sense for Your Organization?
  • Can Nonprofits Benefit From Virtual Currency?
  • Banking on Bitcoin: Nonprofit Success Stories Start to Emerge
  • Does Bitcoin Make Sense for Your Organization?
  • Can Nonprofits Benefit From Virtual Currency?
  • Banking on Bitcoin: Nonprofit Success Stories Start to Emerge
  • Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Organizational Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Organizational Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • pinterest
  • facebook
  • linkedin