> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • Philanthropy 50
  • Nonprofits and the Trump Agenda
  • Impact Stories Hub
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Managing
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Obama 2015 Budget Would Cap Charitable Deduction at 28% for Wealthy

By  Alex Daniels
March 4, 2014
The White House
Richard White/Chronicle of Philanthropy

Updated March 4, 4:16 p.m.

Nonprofits criticized a plan offered by President Obama on Tuesday that would limit the value of all tax deductions, including the charitable deduction, for wealthy taxpayers.

In his budget proposal for fiscal 2015, which starts October 1, Obama called for all deductions to be capped at 28 percent, saying the limit would only affect people whose incomes are in the top 3 percent. The change would affect individuals who earn more than $200,000 and couples who earn more than $250,000.

We're sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network.

Please allow access to our site, and then refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, please contact us at 571-540-8070 or cophelp@philanthropy.com

Updated March 4, 4:16 p.m.

Nonprofits criticized a plan offered by President Obama on Tuesday that would limit the value of all tax deductions, including the charitable deduction, for wealthy taxpayers.

In his budget proposal for fiscal 2015, which starts October 1, Obama called for all deductions to be capped at 28 percent, saying the limit would only affect people whose incomes are in the top 3 percent. The change would affect individuals who earn more than $200,000 and couples who earn more than $250,000.

Foundations and charities have successfully fought back similar attempts to limit the deduction in each of the past six years but said they felt a sense of urgency this year because the tight federal budget has forced lawmakers to try to generate tax revenue wherever they can.

“Everything is on the table,” said Vikki Spruill, chief executive of the Council on Foundations.

ADVERTISEMENT

Limiting the charitable deduction would have a “cascading impact” of charities that depend on money from private sources, she said. “This is an ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’ situation.”

Growing Income Gap

President Obama’s call to limit the deduction was part of his broad $3.8-trillion budget blueprint, with increases in early-childhood education, job training, transportation, and the hourly federal minimum wage, from $7.25 to $10.10.

He noted that as the economy has emerged from a recession, “those at the top” have rarely done better.

“But average wages have barely budged,” he said. “Inequality has deepened. ... Our job is to reverse these trends.”

President Obama proposed:

ADVERTISEMENT

• Creating a “Preschool for All” program that would cost $76-billion over 10 years to pay for pre-kindergarten classes nationally. A similar proposal went nowhere last year.

• Nearly doubling the Earned Income Tax Credit for childless individuals to $1,000. He would also expand eligibility to people as young as 21 and as old as 66. Currently, the credit is available only to those ages 25 through 65.

• Cutting discretionary funding for the Department of Health and Human Services by 1 percent.

• Creating 40 new “Promise Neighborhoods” and 10 to 14 “Choice Neighborhoods” programs, which use federal money to “improve educational outcomes and revitalize distressed neighborhoods.”

• Slashing Community Services Block Grants money, which helps a network of community-action agencies operate antipoverty projects. He proposed a budget of $350-million, down from $674-million this year, and said the money should be awarded competitively to “high-performing agencies that are most successful at meeting community needs.”

ADVERTISEMENT

• Cutting the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program from $3.4-billion this year to $2.8-billion in 2015.

• Keeping a flat budget for the Corporation for National and Community Service, at $1.05-billion, but to move the Foster Grandparent Program and Senior Companion Program into the AmeriCorps national-service program. That will allow AmeriCorps to grow from the current 79,876 members to a record 114,000 members. The plan would keep the budget for the Social Innovation Fund, which provides grants to help nonprofits expand successful projects, at $70-million.

Effects on Poverty

While it would reduce the budget gap, President Obama’s budget clearly steers away from the White House’s focus in recent years on deficit reduction, when the Democratic administration and House Republicans agreed to across-the-board cuts.

But additional money for job training and early-childhood education programs and a more generous Earned Income Tax Credit don’t represent a giant shift in policy toward alleviating poverty, according to Irv Katz, president of the National Human Services Assembly, a nonprofit membership organization. Those proposals simply augment existing efforts to “move people to the lower rungs” of the ladder of economic opportunity, he said.

Programs like the Community Services Block Grants, originally envisioned as being part of the “War on Poverty” in the 1960s have suffered repeated cuts over the years. Mr. Katz said a larger commitment from the White House was necessary to improve the lives of the poor.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We either need to give up the ghost or weave those programs into a strengthened fabric,” he said. “We don’t have a cohesive strategy for helping move folks ahead.”

Though it focuses additional money on domestic social programs, Mr. Obama’s budget does little to escape the pain of the across-the-board cuts known as sequestration that lawmakers have passed over the past two years, according the Debbie Weinstein, executive director of the Coalition on Human Needs. When adjusted for population growth and inflation, the $563-billion budget for key domestic programs in 2015 drops to $458-billion in 2024.

“The president doesn’t quite throw off the straight jacket of sequestration,” Weinstein said. “He wriggles out of it some.”

Both Parties

It’s not just a Democratic administration that is seeking to limit tax write-offs for charitable giving and other causes. Republican members of the House are also targeting the charitable deduction.

Last week Rep. Dave Camp, a Michigan Republican who chairs the House Ways and Means Committee, released a tax blueprint that would also make changes in the charitable deduction. Mr. Camp’s draft legislation would allow people to take deductions for contributions that exceed 2 percent of an individual’s gross income.

ADVERTISEMENT

Though many nonprofit leaders and experts on public policy have expressed doubt that either proposal would be enacted during a politically polarizing election year, Ms. Spruill said nonprofits should remain vigilant. At Ms. Spruill’s invitation, about 200 nonprofit representatives are gathering in Washington to make their case with lawmakers.

“You cannot take any of this lightly,” she said. “These are the things that begin to frame the agenda.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Government and Regulation
Alex Daniels
Before joining the Chronicle in 2013, Alex covered Congress and national politics for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. He covered the 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns and reported extensively about Walmart Stores for the Little Rock paper.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED, GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY
  • Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Podcasts
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    • Impact Stories
    Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Podcasts
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    • Impact Stories
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Gifts and Grants Received
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Chronicle Fellowships
    • Pressroom
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Gifts and Grants Received
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Chronicle Fellowships
    • Pressroom
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Site License Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Site License Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin