> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • Philanthropy 50
  • Nonprofits and the Trump Agenda
  • Impact Stories Hub
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
  • Latest
  • Commons
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Online Events
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Advice
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Recognition Prods People to Give — Even When It’s Not Prominent

By  Alex Daniels
January 4, 2017
Donor Recognition Doesn’t Need To Be Prominent To Work, Study Says 1

The Theory

Researchers have shown that people give more to charity if their gifts are publicized. Such behavior explains why so many donor names are affixed to hospital wings and academic buildings: People give not only because they are altruistic, but because they seek recognition.

Nonprofits can respond to this basic human need by featuring short biographies of their donors in annual reports and fundraising material. But what if a public-television station or an opera company has thousands of donors, making it difficult to shine a spotlight on each one?

We're sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network.

Please allow access to our site, and then refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, please contact us at 571-540-8070 or cophelp@philanthropy.com

Donor Recognition Doesn’t Need To Be Prominent To Work, Study Says 1

The Theory

Researchers have shown that people give more to charity if their gifts are publicized. Such behavior explains why so many donor names are affixed to hospital wings and academic buildings: People give not only because they are altruistic, but because they seek recognition.

Nonprofits can respond to this basic human need by featuring short biographies of their donors in annual reports and fundraising material. But what if a public-television station or an opera company has thousands of donors, making it difficult to shine a spotlight on each one?

Economists Anya Samek of the University of Southern California and Roman Sheremeta of Case Western Reserve University theorize that the recognition doesn’t have to be prominent to be effective.

The Test

The professors gave 120 Purdue University students tokens that represented money they could give to a charity. In one scenario, participants were not told how much others gave. In a second scenario, students were given information about other students’ gifts. In a third scenario, students were told that information about others’ gifts was available if they paid to see it. (The fee represented the time and effort it would take to see who gave if that information was available but not widely advertised by a nonprofit.)

ADVERTISEMENT

Results

Almost twice as many participants donated when the identities and gift amounts of their peers were made freely available than did members of the group that got no such information. That disparity held even among the students who had to pay to learn who else gave. Over the course of the experiment, they chose to access this data less than 10 percent of the time when given the opportunity, but they still donated at a much higher rate than those kept fully in the dark. “Almost no one viewed the information,” Ms. Samek says. “But just knowing the information was there was enough to get people to donate.”

Digging Deeper

Charities often spend a lot of money on full-color fundraising pitches spotlighting donor information, Ms. Samek says. The study suggests they could save money by simply providing a link in an email to an online list of donors. “Either of those would be equally effective,” the economist says.

Similarly, it may not matter whether donors to an opera are listed in huge letters near the front of a program or in a tiny typeface on page 75, she adds. As long as donors know that people can look up their gift, they are more likely to be generous.— alex daniels

Find It

The study, “When Identifying Contributors Is Costly: An Experiment on Public Goods” by Anya Samek and Roman Sheremeta, was published in the January 2016 issue of the Southern Economic Journal.

A version of this article appeared in the January 1, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Digital FundraisingFundraising from IndividualsMass Fundraising
Alex Daniels
Before joining the Chronicle in 2013, Alex covered Congress and national politics for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. He covered the 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns and reported extensively about Walmart Stores for the Little Rock paper.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED, GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY
  • Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Podcasts
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    • Impact Stories
    Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Podcasts
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    • Impact Stories
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Gifts and Grants Received
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Chronicle Fellowships
    • Pressroom
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Our Mission and Values
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Gifts and Grants Received
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Chronicle Fellowships
    • Pressroom
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Site License Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Site License Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin