As the #MeToo movement reverberates through workplaces across America, nonprofit leaders say it is also triggering a reckoning, and creating an opportunity, in charitable fundraising.
Donors are a big source of the sexual harassment that fundraisers face on the job, according to polling results released today by the Chronicle of Philanthropy and the Association of Fundraising Professionals.
Two-thirds of people who reported sexual harassment on the job blamed donors, while the rest said misconduct came from colleagues, mostly those in senior positions.
About one in four female fundraisers has experienced sexual harassment in their careers, according to the poll, while only 7 percent of male fundraisers have. Almost all the harassers — 96 percent — are men, according to the study, which was conducted online in February by the Harris Poll. That data is in line with other estimates of the extent of harassment in U.S. workplaces.
Victims and Offenders
1 in 4 female fundraisers has faced sexual harassment on the job 
Far fewer men than women fundraisers have faced sexual harassment on the job 
96 percent of people who harass fundraisers are men 
|
Share Who Have Experienced or Witnessed Harassment
Yes, a friend or colleague of mine told me they have been sexually harassed in the fundraising profession.
Yes, I have personally been sexually harassed in the fundraising profession.
Yes, I have witnessed sexual harassment in the fundraising profession.
No, I have not personally heard about, witnessed, or personally experienced sexual harassment in the fundraising profession.
|
Because women are the main targets of sexual misconduct, nonprofit leaders say that organizations need to make it a priority to create safe workplaces and to pay attention to broad gender and power dynamics that have permeated fundraising for decades. Beth Ann Locke, a fundraiser at Simon Fraser University who’s written about sexual abuse at nonprofits, says it’s critical that organizations take seriously reports of misconduct and send a message to their employees: “We don’t value donor dollars more than we value your personal safety or personal dignity.”
But equally important, say a growing number of nonprofit and foundation executives, is to focus on power dynamics. While 70 percent of fundraisers are women, according to data from the Association of Fundraising Professionals, chief-executive and board jobs, especially at elite nonprofits, are often held by men.
Lisa Eisen, vice president of the Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation, announced last month a new effort involving other grant makers to help nonprofits build equitable workplaces.
“You start with the issues of harassment and misconduct, but you very quickly get to equity and women’s leadership,” says Eisen. “I’m hoping by addressing some of the more egregious problems that we will start addressing the need to have gender equity in terms of pay and in terms of opportunity and in terms of leadership.”
Many Donors Cross Lines
The survey released today is based on information provided by 1,040 members of the Association of Fundraising Professionals. Most of those who participated raise money at nonprofits or work as consultants to nonprofits. The people polled were employed by nonprofits in the United States, but 106 work in Canada.
The Chronicle joined forces with the association because no other studies had estimated the extent of the harassment problem in the fundraiser work force. Of those who had been harassed, 65 percent said a donor was the culprit in at least one incident. Only 39 percent of fundraisers who had faced wrongdoing said offenders have been co-workers, managers, executives, or board members.
Thirty-five percent also said board members — who often make big gifts to organizations — have been at fault in at least one instance.
Who the Perpetrators Are
Fundraisers who have been harassed ...
65%said at least one offender was a donor
Fundraisers who have been harassed said at least one offender was a ...
Note: Fundraisers who were harassed more than once may have selected more than one perpetrator.
|
Colleagues Who Sexually Harass
In a superior position to you
|
Big donors have a lot of influence over nonprofits, especially because many fundraisers are rated on their ability to pull in large donations. Adding to the challenge: Meetings with donors often occur in intimate settings, like in homes, at bars, or in restaurants — increasing the odds that harassment will take place, experts say.
“Harassment is always about power, so the results here might indicate that the real power in these organizations rests with the donors,” says Jerry Carbo, a professor at Shippensburg University who served on a federal committee studying harassment in the workplace in 2015 and 2016. “I would normally expect to see a much higher response rate for supervisors.”
Some 18 percent of fundraisers who reported being harassed said their direct supervisor or manager was to blame in at least one case. Eighteen percent also listed an executive-level colleague as an offender.
Types of Harassment
Most of the harassment that fundraisers encountered came in the form of inappropriate sexual comments. Eighty percent of fundraisers who had been harassed said they had experienced inappropriate sexual comments in their careers. About one quarter of fundraisers said they had been asked for sexual favors.
Most Common Forms of Sexual Harassment
Of the fundraisers who said they'd been harassed ...
80%faced inappropriate comments of a sexual nature
55%experienced unwanted touching or physical contact
36%encountered unwelcome sexual advances
29%faced verbal abuse of a sexual nature
26%received requests for sexual favors
|
Though 43 percent of fundraisers who experienced harassment reported incidents to their organizations, some 27 percent reported taking no action. Others took smaller steps, like distancing themselves from offenders.
A little more than one-quarter of fundraisers said they’d heard about or witnessed sexual harassment but took no action.
What Actions Victims Took
Set a boundary with the perpetrator
Moved the donor or relationship to another colleague
|
Those numbers are troubling, says Cynthia Calvert, a lawyer who advises nonprofits and companies on sexual misconduct complaints and policies.
Still, they are not uncommon. She notes that a CareerBuilder survey released in January, also conducted by the Harris Poll, found that 72 percent of workers across the nation who had experienced harassment on the job did not report the incidents — which suggests that nonprofits are doing better at fostering cultures in which people feel they can come forward with complaints. Nevertheless, she says, if anyone refrains from reporting harassment, it’s a problem. “Organizations should not rest until those numbers are zero,” Calvert said in an email.
The results also underscore the need for nonprofits to conduct training to help people who witness harassment better understand how they might respond when they witness misconduct, says Sarah Beaulieu, a former university fundraiser and founder of the Uncomfortable Conversation, an organization that creates educational videos on sexual harassment.
Many fundraisers who have reported harassment to organizations said they were unhappy with the results. Slightly more than half said they were either somewhat dissatisfied or extremely dissatisfied with how the organization handled their allegations. About 45 percent said the organization took no action after they reported an incident, and 13 percent said their allegations were minimized. (Harris pointed out that these figures should be read with caution because of the small percentage of people who gave this response.)
Those figures are a “red flag,” says Calvert, and probably mean that nonprofits’ human-resources officials need training on how to handle complaints.
Fundraisers’ Level of Satisfaction With the Nonprofit’s Response
Note: Because only a small share of fundraisers reported harassment, this percentage comes from a small sample size.
Somewhat or extremely satisfied
Somewhat or extremely dissatisfied
|
#MeToo’s Impact
Many fundraisers said they were encouraged by the changes brought about as women across the nation have more openly discussed their concerns about harassment — and harassers at nonprofits and elsewhere have been forced to step down as a result. Some 35 percent of fundraisers strongly agreed that the #MeToo movement is having a positive effect on workplace culture and policy, while 48 percent somewhat agreed. About 18 percent strongly or somewhat disagreed.
Sixty-one percent of fundraisers agreed that people have a better understanding of harassment given all the recent coverage of sexual misconduct in the news media, while 18 percent disagreed, and 21 percent said they were unsure.
Almost all of those polled — 93 percent — either agreed or somewhat agreed that a zero-tolerance policy on sexual harassment should be enforced in every work environment.
Opinions About Harassment in the Workplace
- Strongly agree
- Somewhat agree
A zero-tolerance policy should be put in place in every work environment.
Sexual harassment allegations in fundraising are more likely to be taken seriously today than ever before.
I feel my organization would support me should I ever experience sexual harassment.
I am aware of the steps to take should I experience or witness sexual harassment.
The #MeToo movement is having a positive effect on workplace culture and policy.
Sexual harassment is rampant in the profession of fundraising.
My organization values the loyalty of donors more than it values the safety of employees.
|
Is Fundraising Unique?
Polls and studies offer a wide range of figures on the prevalence of sexual harassment in workplaces. A 2016 U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission report found that 25 percent to 85 percent of women reported experiencing sexual harassment at work — which would put fundraisers’ experiences with misconduct in line the agency’s more conservative estimate.
The report noted that when surveys asked about specific kinds of misconduct — like unwanted touching, attention, or comments — reported harassment was higher than when the term “sexual harassment” was undefined.
The Chronicle and AFP poll hinted at the kinds of sexual harassment it was trying to measure but did not define it throughout, which could have lowered the number of people who reported abuse, experts say.
Also, people who belong to a professional association like AFP may already have good feelings about the field, notes Ariane Hegewisch, an official at the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, who has studied harassment in the workplace. What’s more, people who left fundraising because they were harassed were not surveyed, she says.
Sexual Harassment and Fundraising: A Landmark Poll
Download a copy of Harris Poll’s summary of the key findings and all the data on the poll commissioned by the Chronicle of Philanthropy and the Association of Fundraising Professionals.
Still, Harris says AFP’s membership list — which consisted of more than 20,000 people — offered a way to poll those working in fundraising specifically. Without that list, doing such a targeted survey would have been very difficult, says David Krane, director of the Harris Poll’s research team.
Krane notes that an early question did hint at the types of harassment the survey was seeking to capture, but he acknowledges that it was not defined throughout the survey — including in a question where respondents were specifically asked if they had experienced sexual harassment in the fundraising field. It’s possible that if the survey had listed all types of harassment — inappropriate comments, unwanted touching, and so forth — the results might have been different, he says.
That said, Krane also notes that the survey was conducted in the midst of heavy news coverage of sexual harassment — which means it would have likely been top of mind for many people.
Carbo, of Shippensburg University, agrees, but he notes that it’s still striking that so many fundraisers who care enough to join a group like AFP report being harassed. “It shows how problematic it is,” he said, “because you are dealing with people who are proud to be part of the fundraising profession — and still, one in four reporting.”
Megan O’Neil contributed to this article.