> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • An Update for Readers on Our New Nonprofit Status
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • Latest
  • Advice
  • Opinion
  • Webinars
  • Data
  • Grants
  • Magazine
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
    • Featured Products
    • Data
    • Reports
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Webinars
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Advice
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

What to Do When a Big Donor Becomes Tainted

By  Timothy Sandoval
October 11, 2016
Former Turing Pharmaceuticals CEO Martin Shkreli at a congressional hearing on drug pricing in February 2016. Charities to which Mr. Shkreli donated faced a dilemma when he became the target of public scorn for jacking up the price of life-saving medications.
Joshua Roberts, Reuters
Former Turing Pharmaceuticals CEO Martin Shkreli at a congressional hearing on drug pricing in February 2016. Charities to which Mr. Shkreli donated faced a dilemma when he became the target of public scorn for jacking up the price of life-saving medications.

Jake Maguire got an unexpected call in December 2015. A reporter was inquiring about a $15,000 gift made earlier in the year to Community Solutions, a New York charity where Mr. Maguire works.

There was nothing unusual about the donation to the nonprofit, which works to end homelessness, except its source: Martin Shkreli, the controversial former pharmaceuticals executive. Mr. Shkreli was called perhaps “the most hated man in America” last year after his company raised the price of a drug used by AIDS and cancer patients by more than 5,500 percent. Around the time Mr. Maguire got the call, Mr. Shkreli had been charged with securities fraud for his actions at other companies.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from v144.philanthropy.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Jake Maguire got an unexpected call in December 2015. A reporter was inquiring about a $15,000 gift made earlier in the year to Community Solutions, a New York charity where Mr. Maguire works.

There was nothing unusual about the donation to the nonprofit, which works to end homelessness, except its source: Martin Shkreli, the controversial former pharmaceuticals executive. Mr. Shkreli was called perhaps “the most hated man in America” last year after his company raised the price of a drug used by AIDS and cancer patients by more than 5,500 percent. Around the time Mr. Maguire got the call, Mr. Shkreli had been charged with securities fraud for his actions at other companies.

After speaking with the reporter, Mr. Maguire, the head of communications for Community Solutions, spoke with top executives and leaders at the charity, and they took swift action, deciding to return the gift. Mr. Maguire called the reporter back, explaining that Community Solutions works with many people who depend on HIV and AIDS medicines, so it made little sense to accept a gift from someone accused of profiteering from patients.

Such situations are more common than most people at nonprofits think, experts say, and decisions about how to respond aren’t always quick or simple. When donors do things that lead to public scorn, it may be difficult to determine what kind of response is necessary, or if one is even required. Many questions come up: Should the charity return the donor’s gift? Should it keep the money, but repudiate the donor? Or should the group just stay silent?

When naming rights are involved, or when someone has made very large donations, a decision to keep or return the money is even trickier. Take Hunter College High School, a public school in New York that received $1 million for an endowment bearing Mr. Shkreli’s name in March 2015 — the biggest contribution the school has ever seen.

ADVERTISEMENT

Looking back, the school might regret having sent out a news release with a headline calling Mr. Shkreli a “pioneering healthcare executive” when it announced the gift. (Mr. Shkreli stepped down last year from the controversial pharmaceuticals company he ran.) However, it’s keeping the money, a spokesperson told The Chronicle in an email, despite the urging of some alumni and students to return it. The funds will pay for projects like a redesigned foreign-language laboratory and college tours for rising seniors who may not be able to afford them, according to the spokesperson, who added that a “thorough review” had been undertaken by the Hunter College Foundation, alumni, and others, who decided that the best decision was to keep the money.

Although these situations can be difficult to navigate, experts say there are principles and practices that can help nonprofits that are dealing with a “tainted” donor.

Tips

  • Consider doing a background check after receiving a pledge of a big gift. Even a basic Google or LexisNexis search can sometimes reveal embarrassing information.

  • If the reason for a donor’s big gift isn’t obvious, ask more questions, and dig a little deeper.

  • Assess the donor’s demeanor. If the donor is difficult or evasive, it may be a red flag.

  • Be wary of hidden motives and unusual requests, like a donor pushing a relative for a job at your organization.

  • Have a crisis plan in place in case bad news breaks about a past donor. Identify who is authorized to speak to the media.

  • Be open and honest with the public and your supporters. Acknowledge the difficulties a problem donor has caused for your organization, and explain the process for how you decided whether to return a gift.

  • If you decide to keep a gift from a “tainted” donor, be honest about why, and emphasize the good you’re doing with the donation.

Perform Due Diligence

Background checks on big donors will prevent some problems, experts say. This can include simple steps like asking donors basic questions about why they are making the gift, and doing Google and LexisNexis searches for embarrassing information about donors. Such steps are especially important when the charity doesn’t know the donor well, although any supporter can have skeletons in the closet, experts say.

Paul Dunn, a professor of business ethics at Brock University in Ontario, Canada, has analyzed many cases in which naming-rights deals came into question following a donor scandal. He advises nonprofits to ask “Who is the individual? What is the individual’s background? Why is the person making the donation?”

A complicating factor: Most fundraisers are usually thrilled to get a large gift and don’t want to complicate things, says Robert Waldman, an attorney at Venable LLP who oversees the firm’s tax-exempt clients. And some donors’ crimes or misdeeds are virtually impossible to find, he says, citing Bill Cosby as an example of someone many universities and charities probably thought was squeaky clean when they accepted gifts from him — before he was accused of sexual assault by dozens of women.

ADVERTISEMENT

To Mr. Waldman, a donor’s behavior may be more telling. Are they unresponsive and difficult to work with? Are they asking your organization to hold on to assets for longer than usual, or to do something ethically fraught, like hiring their sibling after the donation is made?

“If they are asking you to do something that makes you a little uncomfortable, that’s usually a sign there’s an issue here,” Mr. Waldman says.

Prepare Guidelines

There’s no foolproof way to vet donors, experts say, and many nonprofit leaders are reluctant to advocate for extensive probes into a donor’s background.

But nonprofits should have written guidelines before a scandal breaks to help deal with such situations, Mr. Dunn says.

There are many variables to weigh, he says, including whether the donor’s actions are truly out of step with the charity’s mission, or who, exactly, is angry about what the supporter has done. Is it many or just a vocal few? Are the donor’s actions gaining prominent media attention? Can the nonprofit absorb a loss if it returns a gift?

ADVERTISEMENT

Nancy Schwartz, a nonprofit communications consultant, agreed that organizations should have a crisis communication plan ready to deal with such situations. Such plans might lay out a decision tree for who is authorized to craft and approve the organization’s response, she says.

Be Open and Honest

If a nonprofit returns a gift or rescinds a public honor, it should emphasize that the organization is being accountable and transparent, and is acting in a manner compatible with its values, Ms. Schwartz says.

She points to a recent statement by Ohio University as a good example of how to handle such situations. After pressure from faculty and students, the university decided in September to remove the name of former Fox News chairman Roger Ailes from a newsroom in the communications college and return a $500,000 donation from the former news executive. The move came after allegations surfaced that Mr. Ailes sexaully harrassed many women during his career; he was fired by 20th Century Fox in the wake of the scandal.

University president Roderick McDavis said in the statement that he decided to return the gift after listening to faculty, staff, student, and alumni views on the matter and consulting with the dean of the communications college and other university leaders.

“It’s really a model for crisis communications overall,” says Ms. Schwartz, noting the statement has a measured tone, an explanation of how thoroughly the decision was considered, and an acknowledgment that the university had been “disrupted” by the controversy. It seemed heartfelt and authentic, she added.

ADVERTISEMENT

Keeping the Money

Of course, many charities are not in a position to return a big gift. In such cases, Ms. Schwartz says, it’s best to be honest and tell supporters and others that returning a donation would undermine the organization. In such cases, Ms. Schwartz advises emphasizing the organization’s mission and the services provided by the donor’s money.

Some might choose to stay quiet if the organization is keeping a controversial donor’s money, but Ms. Schwartz advises against that. “I wouldn’t try and let it pass or see if it strays from the public limelight, because somebody else will talk about it if you don’t,” she says.

Mr. Maguire, of Community Solutions, admits it was a luxury that his group was able to absorb the loss of Mr. Shkreli’s $15,000 gift. But he adds that the organization recouped some of the money thanks to small contributions from people who praised the decision to return the donation. However, Mr. Maguire stressed that every situation is different and not every group can make the same choice.

“I think it’s important to preserve people’s ability to make those kinds of calculations,” Mr. Maguire says. “One thing you don’t want to do in the name of taking a stand is do more harm to the people you’re trying to serve than you would have otherwise.”

Read other items in this Communicating in a Crisis package.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Fundraising from Individuals
Timothy Sandoval
Sandoval covered nonprofit fundraising for The Chronicle of Philanthropy. He wrote on a variety of subjects including nonprofits’ reactions to the election of Donald Trump, questionable spending at a major veterans charity, and clever Valentine’s Day appeals.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Latest Articles
    • Get Newsletters
    • Advice
    • Webinars
    • Data & Research
    • Magazine
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Work at the Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Gift-Acceptance Policy
    • Site Map
    • DEI Commitment Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Organizational Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Organizational Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Philanthropy
  • twitter
  • youtube
  • pinterest
  • facebook
  • linkedin